Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary

Los Angeles, CA · official site ↗

Private nonprofitBaccalaureate/Associate's: Assoc. DominantSmall
76
Fin. Resilience
Resilience score

vs. 205 peers in its group

Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary is a private nonprofit institution in Los Angeles, CA, classified by Carnegie as “Baccalaureate/Associate's: Assoc. Dominant.”

It enrolls about 163 undergraduates and is benchmarked here against 205 peer institutions (Baccalaureate/Associate's: Assoc. Dominant · Private nonprofit).

On Ibex's Financial Resilience score it rates 76 out of 100 within that peer group, a transparent composite of endowment per undergraduate, net tuition revenue per student, and instructional spend per student.

Its strongest standing relative to peers is net tuition revenue / fte ($18,770, 90th percentile).

Its weakest is graduation rate (6-yr · first-time, full-time) (11.9%).

Peer group

Baccalaureate/Associate's: Assoc. Dominant · Private nonprofit

205 institutions

No cross-metric risk flags triggered.

How exposed Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary is to the structural shifts reshaping higher ed: a composite structural-risk index plus the 2025 federal budget law’s endowment excise tax and Grad PLUS elimination and the demographic enrollment cliff. Only signals that apply to this institution are shown.

Structural risk indexAn indicative 0–100 structural-risk index (higher = more pressure) blending operating margin, months of cash cushion, tuition dependency and the home-state enrollment cliff. Screens for the financial and demographic strain that precedes closures and mergers — directional, not a prediction.
33
Low
Enrollment cliff (home state)Projected change in the institution's home-state high-school graduates from 2025 to 2041 (WICHE). The U.S. total falls about 13%; a directional feeder-market signal, not an enrollment forecast.
-27.7%
Severe decline

Indicative signals, not forecasts — see each metric’s definition and the methodology. Endowment-tax and Grad PLUS figures appear only where the institution is actually exposed; “nationally” compares against all schools that report each signal.

Turn these signals into action

Seeing exposure is step one. Ibex builds AI agents that monitor and act on exactly these pressures — explore an interactive demo. Live demos run real workflows; the rest are working mockups we build to your institution’s data.

7.8
on a −4 to 10 scale
Financial Health IndexStrong

NACUBO Composite Financial Index — the balance-sheet health score accreditors and institutional boards use to gauge financial health; bond-rating agencies track similar ratios. 87th percentile of 205 peers.

Primary reserve 35%9.4 mo
Reserves vs. debt 35%16.73×
Return on net assets 20%12.3%
Operating result 10%16.2%

Composite of four ratios on a strength-factor scale (−4 weak → 10 strong): below 3 falls short of the threshold for financial health, below 1 signals acute stress, and above 6 is strong. Computed from IPEDS FY2022-23, the most recent finance release (it lags the current year by 2–3 years). Branch campuses that report finances at a parent/system level can show distorted ratios. For informational benchmarking, not a credit rating or financial advice.

Where the money comes from $12.8M total revenue · IPEDS FY2022-23

Other revenue is the largest single source at 58% of revenue.

Other revenue58.4%
Tuition & fees26.6%
Private gifts & grants10.9%
Government grants & contracts2.8%
Investment return1.4%

Where each dollar of revenue comes from, as a share of total positive revenue. Sources are standardized across public (GASB) and private (FASB) reporting; a net investment loss in a down market is shown as 0% and excluded from the mix.

Average net price by family income After grant & scholarship aid · Scorecard 2024-25
$0–30K$14,300
$30–48K$15,486
$48–75K$13,987
$75–110K$16,940
$110K+$10,300

Average annual net price (total cost minus grant and scholarship aid) paid by federal-aid recipients in each family-income band. Lower-income bands often pay less where need-based aid is strong.

Net tuition revenue / FTETuition revenue per full-time-equivalent student after institutional aid/discounts — what tuition actually nets.
Strong
$18,770
90th percentile in peer grouppeer median $9,833
Instructional spend / FTESpending on instruction per FTE student — how much of the budget reaches the classroom.
Average
$14,395
61st percentile in peer grouppeer median $10,996
In-state tuition & feesPublished in-state tuition and fees before aid (sticker price).
$16,900
87th percentile in peer grouppeer median $11,500
Out-of-state tuition & feesPublished out-of-state tuition and fees before aid (sticker price).
$16,900
87th percentile in peer grouppeer median $11,500
Avg annual cost of attendanceAverage total annual cost — tuition, fees and living costs — before aid.
$31,300
83rd percentile in peer grouppeer median $23,002
Avg monthly faculty salaryAverage monthly salary of full-time faculty (IPEDS) — a proxy for faculty investment.
Average
$5,655
49th percentile in peer grouppeer median $5,681
Average monthly salary of full-time faculty, as reported to IPEDS.
Average net priceAverage yearly price families actually pay after grants and scholarships.
Average
$14,959
64th percentile in peer grouppeer median $11,752
Operating marginNet surplus as a share of total revenue — whether the institution runs in the black.
Strong
16.2%
65th percentile in peer grouppeer median 9.4%
Net surplus as a share of total revenue (IPEDS FY2022-23): (total revenues − total expenses) ÷ total revenues. A surplus above 4% is strong; a thin surplus near 0% leaves little margin for shocks.
Tuition dependencyTuition's share of total revenue — how exposed the budget is to enrollment swings.
26.6%
54th percentile in peer grouppeer median 24.9%
Tuition & fees as a share of total revenue (IPEDS FY2022-23). Higher = more exposed to enrollment swings.
Tuition discount rateInstitutional grant aid as a share of gross tuition (IPEDS, private nonprofits only) — the tuition-discount rate. The share of sticker tuition handed back as aid; a high rate (the national average is ~56%) signals heavy price competition for students.
Moderate
27.8%
53rd percentile in peer grouppeer median 27.3%
Institutional grant aid as a share of gross tuition & fee revenue (IPEDS FY2022-23, FASB): allowances applied to tuition ÷ (net tuition revenue + those allowances) — the tuition-discount rate enrollment leaders track, i.e. the share of sticker tuition handed back as institutional aid. Private nonprofit institutions only; public (GASB) institutions report tuition differently and are not shown. The national private-college average is roughly 56% (NACUBO); above ~60% signals heavy price competition.
State appropriations shareState appropriations' share of total revenue — material for public institutions, near zero for private.
0%
100th percentile in peer grouppeer median 0%
State appropriations as a share of total revenue (IPEDS FY2022-23). Material for public institutions; ~0 for private.
Administrative cost shareInstitutional support (central administration, governance, general administration, fundraising, and under FASB the operation & maintenance of plant) as a share of total expenses — private nonprofit (FASB) institutions only, where the figure is comparable. An informational gauge of administrative intensity, not a measure of waste.
5.2%
1st percentile in peer grouppeer median 28.7%
Institutional support — central administration, executive management, governance, general administration, fundraising and (under FASB rules) operation & maintenance of plant — as a share of total expenses (IPEDS FY2022-23, FASB). Private nonprofit institutions only: public (GASB) institutions report functional expenses on a different basis and frequently consolidate large hospital and auxiliary operations, which makes a comparable ratio unreliable, so they are not shown. Because FASB folds plant operations into institutional support, this runs higher than a narrow 'central-office' figure, and schools with sizable hospital or auxiliary operations show a lower ratio as those costs enlarge total expenses. An informational benchmark of administrative intensity, compared within the peer group — not a measure of waste or quality.
Months of operating cushionMonths of operating expenses covered by expendable reserves — the institution's cash cushion.
Strong
9.4 mo
44th percentile in peer grouppeer median 11.5 mo
How many months of operating expenses the institution could cover from expendable reserves (IPEDS FY2022-23 primary reserve ratio × 12). About 5 months — one semester — is the accreditor benchmark for solid footing; below ~3 months is thin. A negative figure means expendable reserves are themselves negative.
Reserves vs. debtExpendable reserves divided by long-term debt — whether reserves could cover the debt.
Strong
16.73×
89th percentile in peer grouppeer median 1.49×
Expendable reserves ÷ plant-related debt (IPEDS FY2022-23 viability ratio). At or above 1.25×, reserves fully cover long-term debt. Shown blank when the institution carries little or no plant debt.
Return on net assetsChange in net assets over the year — whether the institution grew wealthier.
Strong
12.3%
79th percentile in peer grouppeer median 3.5%
Change in total net assets ÷ net assets (IPEDS FY2022-23) — whether the institution grew wealthier over the year. 2–4% is adequate; above 4% is strong.
Structural risk indexAn indicative 0–100 structural-risk index (higher = more pressure) blending operating margin, months of cash cushion, tuition dependency and the home-state enrollment cliff. Screens for the financial and demographic strain that precedes closures and mergers — directional, not a prediction.
Low
33
percentile in peer group
An indicative 0–100 structural-risk index (higher = more pressure), an equal-weight blend of the stress signals we measure: thin or negative operating margin, low months of operating cushion, high tuition dependency, and a shrinking home-state high-school-graduate pipeline (enrollment cliff). Averaged over whichever signals are available (at least two required). It screens for the financial and demographic pressures that precede closures and mergers — a directional indicator, NOT a prediction that any institution will close, and not a credit rating.
Graduation rate · first-time, full-time
11.9%

11.9% graduate within 6 years (150% of normal time)
8.5% on-time, within 4 years (100%)
Counts only students who entered full-time as first-time freshmen and earned a bachelor's here — the conventional headline rate. Excludes part-time entrants and transfer-ins.

Completion rate · all students
20.3%

20.3% earned a degree or certificate within 8 years (IPEDS Outcome Measures)
The broader cohort — also counts part-time entrants and transfer-ins, and any credential. More inclusive, so it can run higher than the graduation rate.

Why two numbers? They measure different students over different windows, so they are not directly comparable. The graduation rate is the standard federal headline but tracks only first-time, full-time students through a bachelor's; the all-students completion rate adds the part-time and transfer students it leaves out, over a longer window. Read each for what it covers. Source: U.S. Department of Education — IPEDS Graduation Rates & Outcome Measures, via College Scorecard.

Undergraduate enrollmentNumber of degree-seeking undergraduates (IPEDS fall headcount). A size measure, not a quality signal.
163
67th percentile in peer grouppeer median 114
Admission rateShare of applicants offered admission. Lower means more selective; open-admission schools report none.
58.2%
29th percentile in peer grouppeer median 83%
First-year retentionShare of first-time, full-time freshmen who return for a second year — an early signal of student fit and support.
Strong
95.1%
73rd percentile in peer grouppeer median 82%
Graduation rate (6-yr · first-time, full-time)Of first-time, full-time freshmen, the share who earn a bachelor's at this institution within six years (150% of normal time) — the conventional headline graduation rate. It counts only first-time, full-time students and excludes part-time entrants and transfer-ins, who are captured instead by the all-students completion rate.
Below peers
11.9%
14th percentile in peer grouppeer median 42.9%
Graduation rate (4-yr on-time · first-time, full-time)Of first-time, full-time freshmen, the share who earn a bachelor's within four years (100% of normal time) — the 'on-time' rate. It runs well below the six-year rate because many students take a fifth or sixth year; same first-time, full-time cohort as the six-year rate.
Average
8.5%
47th percentile in peer grouppeer median 10.7%
Pell recipient shareShare of undergraduates on a federal Pell Grant — a proxy for the share from lower-income families.
70.1%
79th percentile in peer grouppeer median 44.1%
12-month FTE enrollmentFull-time-equivalent enrollment over the full year — the denominator for per-student finance measures.
161
63rd percentile in peer grouppeer median 115
Full-time-equivalent enrollment over the full 12-month year (IPEDS 12-month enrollment, 2022-23). Counts part-time students at their fractional load, so it runs above fall full-time headcount and is the denominator used for per-student finance measures.
Student-faculty ratioStudents per instructional faculty member — lower usually means smaller classes and more contact.
16:1
77th percentile in peer grouppeer median 12:1
Students per instructional faculty member (IPEDS, fall 2023). Lower generally means smaller classes and more faculty contact, though the measure mixes undergraduate and graduate teaching and is institution-reported.
Enrollment cliff (home state)Projected change in the institution's home-state high-school graduates from 2025 to 2041 (WICHE). The U.S. total falls about 13%; a directional feeder-market signal, not an enrollment forecast.
Severe decline
-27.7%
percentile in peer group
Projected change in the number of high-school graduates in the institution's HOME STATE from the class of 2025 (the national peak) to 2041, per WICHE's Knocking at the College Door, 11th Edition (Dec 2024). The 'enrollment cliff' is the post-2008 birth decline reaching college age; the U.S. total is projected to fall about 13% over this window. A college recruits from many states, so its home-state projection is an indicative directional signal of feeder-market pressure, not a forecast of that institution's own enrollment.
Completion rate (all students · 8-yr)Of ALL entering degree-seeking undergraduates — full- and part-time, first-time and transfer-in — the share who earned a degree or certificate at this institution within eight years (IPEDS Outcome Measures). Broader than the graduation rate, which counts only first-time, full-time students, so the two are measured on different students and are not directly comparable.
Below peers
20.3%
16th percentile in peer grouppeer median 42.6%
Share of ALL entering degree-seeking undergraduates — full- and part-time, first-time and transfer-in — who earned a degree or certificate at this institution within eight years (IPEDS Outcome Measures, via College Scorecard). Broader and more inclusive than the graduation-rate figures, which count only first-time, full-time students entering a bachelor's program — so the two are measured on different groups of students and are not directly comparable.
Admission yield
Average
92.4%
56th percentile in peer grouppeer median 88.3%
Share of admitted students who enrolled (IPEDS Admissions, Fall 2023): students who enrolled ÷ students admitted. A demand signal — how many accepted offers the institution converts to enrollment. Higher yield generally reflects stronger demand, though binding early-decision programs and price positioning can inflate it. Open-admission institutions do not report admissions and show none.
Undergraduate race & ethnicity IPEDS 2024-25
White98.8%
International1.2%

Undergraduate enrollment by race and ethnicity, as reported to IPEDS (College Scorecard). “International” denotes nonresident students; “Unknown” means race/ethnicity was not reported.

Median earnings (10 yr)Median earnings of former students ten years after first enrolling (working, federally-aided students).
Strong
$48,361
80th percentile in peer grouppeer median $38,936
Share taking federal loansShare of students taking out federal loans — a borrowing-reliance signal.
0%
64th percentile in peer grouppeer median 0%
Full-time faculty shareShare of faculty employed full-time — higher generally means more availability and continuity.
Below peers
59.1%
30th percentile in peer grouppeer median 80%
Return on credentialMedian 10-year earnings divided by the four-year cost of attendance (annual cost × 4) — a rough payback ratio for the degree.
Average
0.39×
63rd percentile in peer grouppeer median 0.35×
Median 10-year earnings divided by the four-year cost of attendance (average annual cost × 4). A rough payback ratio: 1.0× means a graduate's annual 10-year earnings roughly equal the full four-year sticker cost. Earnings reflect federally-aided students; cost of attendance is the published sticker price before aid, so this is conservative relative to what families net of aid pay.

Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary’s largest fields by completions, with graduate earnings (4 years out) and debt benchmarked against the same field at its peer group. Sparklines show the 8-year completions trend.

FieldCompletions / yrMedian earnings, 4 yrs outMedian debtEarnings premiumRisk score
Philosophy & Religious Studies14$38,872
75th pct · 16 peers
Above benchmark +1%High · 77

All 1 top fields shown clear the CA state earnings-premium benchmark (indicative).

Earnings-premium status is an indicative estimate: median graduate earnings four years out vs the CA state median earnings of a high-school graduate (undergraduate credentials) or a bachelor’s-degree holder (graduate credentials) from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (2022 ACS 5-year). The official U.S. Department of Education determination uses its own cohort definition and may differ.

The risk score (0–100) is an indicative blend of earnings-premium margin and the five-year completions trend—higher means a field pays closer to (or below) the benchmark and is shrinking. A directional screen, not an official determination.

See the interactive dashboard for all fields and credential levels (associate through doctoral). Source: College Scorecard Field of Study.

How financially healthy is Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary?
On the NACUBO Composite Financial Index — the −4 to 10 balance-sheet score accreditors and institutional boards use — Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary scores 7.8 (Strong), computed from its IPEDS FY2022-23 finances. This is informational benchmarking, not a credit rating.
How selective is Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary?
Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary admits about 58% of applicants, and roughly 95% of first-year students return for a second year.
What is Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary's student-faculty ratio?
Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary reports a student-faculty ratio of 16:1 (IPEDS, fall 2023) — that is, about 16 students for every instructional faculty member.
How much does Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary cost?
The average published cost of attendance is $31,300 and the average net price after aid is $14,959 (College Scorecard).
How much do Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary graduates earn?
Median earnings ten years after entry are $48,361 (College Scorecard), measured across students who received federal aid.
Are Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary's programs at risk under the federal earnings-premium test?
Indicatively, at Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary, the single largest field with available earnings data clears the CA state earnings-premium benchmark used by the 2025 federal test (effective July 1, 2026) — median graduate earnings (four years out) exceed those of a typical worker without the credential. This is an estimate using College Scorecard earnings vs ACS medians; the official Department of Education determination may differ.

Explore Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary interactively

Open the full dashboard to switch peer views, hover trends, and compare head-to-head.

Open in dashboard

Want a custom dashboard for Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary?

We build tailored intelligence dashboards — Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary and the peer set you choose, the metrics and risk signals your team cares about, kept current and delivered to you. Tell us what you’d want to track and a specialist will scope it with you.

Request a custom dashboard

Source: U.S. Department of Education — College Scorecard & IPEDS (most recent releases), with the U.S. Census Bureau (ACS), the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (Employment Projections, field-demand outlook) and WICHE (enrollment-cliff projections). Figures lag the current academic year by roughly two to three years. Percentiles and medians are computed within the institution's peer group. Financial Resilience is a transparent composite — see each component above. Compiled by Ibex Insights.