The University of Arizona Global Campus

PublicDoctoral/Professional UniversityLarge

Fin. Resilience

Resilience score

vs. 31 peers in its group

The University of Arizona Global Campus is a public institution in Chandler, AZ, classified by Carnegie as “Doctoral/Professional University.”

It enrolls about 20,152 undergraduates and is benchmarked here against 31 peer institutions (Doctoral/Professional University · Public).

On Ibex's Financial Resilience score it rates 28 out of 100 within that peer group, a transparent composite of endowment per undergraduate, net tuition revenue per student, and instructional spend per student.

Its strongest standing relative to peers is net-price momentum (CAGR) (-6.5%, 2nd percentile).

Its weakest is completion rate (all students · 8-yr) (19.2%).

Ibex's cross-metric scan flags: Undergrad enrollment down 43% since 2016; First-year retention 35% (below 60%).

Peer group

Doctoral/Professional University · Public

31 institutions

Undergrad enrollment down 43% since 2016

First-year retention 35% (below 60%)

Percentile profileoutward = stronger vs peers

Each spoke is this institution’s peer-group standing (0–100) on a headline metric, oriented so outward always means stronger (lower net price scores higher). A balanced large shape signals broad strength; a spiky shape flags specific weak spots.

What changedlargest year-over-year moves

Net tuition revenue / FTE ▼ -29% $10,427 → $7,437 2023→2024

Graduation rate (6-yr · first-time, full-time) ▲ +22% 8.8% → 10.7% 2023→2024

Undergraduate enrollment ▼ -15% 23,734 → 20,152 2023→2024

First-year retention ▲ +13% 30.6% → 34.7% 2023→2024

In-state tuition & fees ▼ -9% $13,160 → $11,960 2023→2024

Instructional spend / FTE ▲ +4% $1,661 → $1,727 2023→2024

Most recent single-year change in each tracked metric. Green = moved in this metric’s favorable direction, red = unfavorable, grey = size or context, not scored. Each row uses the latest pair of years that metric has, and federal collections release on different schedules, so the years differ from row to row: read the years on the row, not just the ranking. A single year is also not a trend, the multi-year series is on each metric’s card below.

Policy & demographic exposure

How exposed The University of Arizona Global Campus is to the structural shifts reshaping higher ed: a composite structural-risk index plus the 2025 federal budget law’s endowment excise tax, Grad PLUS elimination, new Parent PLUS borrowing cap and new Workforce Pell short-term-credential opportunity, and the demographic enrollment cliff. Only signals that apply to this institution are shown.

Structural risk index

Elevated

Grad PLUS exposure

9.5%

Low exposure

Higher than 32% of schools nationally

AY2025-26 YTD (through Q2, Dec 2025)

Avg Grad PLUS loan

$17,340

Half the cap+

Higher than 42% of schools nationally

AY2025-26 YTD (through Q2, Dec 2025)

Enrollment cliff (home state)

-4.9%

Moderate decline

Indicative signals, not forecasts, see each metric’s definition and the methodology. Endowment-tax, Grad PLUS, Parent PLUS and Workforce Pell figures appear only where the institution is actually exposed; “nationally” compares against all schools that report each signal.

Turn these signals into action

Seeing exposure is step one. Ibex builds AI agents that monitor and act on exactly these pressures, explore an interactive demo. Live demos run real workflows; the rest are working mockups we build to your institution’s data.

Market Intelligence Agentlive demo Financial Aid Agent AI Recruiter Agent

Enrollment shock

What an enrollment loss would do to the budget

Tuition and fees fund 79% of this institution’s revenue, and it runs a 11.0% operating margin. It could lose about 13.9% of its enrollment before the surplus becomes a deficit, if nothing else changed.

Enrollment loss: 10%

3.3% operating margin after the loss, with costs unchanged

A deliberately simple counterfactual: net tuition per student and total costs stay where the latest IPEDS finance filing put them, so only the tuition line moves. No institution facing this would hold costs flat, which is the point, the figure is the gap that would have to be closed, not a forecast of the margin it would report. A school that responds by discounting harder to hold headcount converts the same problem into a net-price one, and it does not show up here.

Revenue composition

Where the money comes from $299.3M total revenue · IPEDS FY2022-23

Tuition & fees is the largest single source at 79% of revenue.

Tuition & fees79.3%

Other revenue17.7%

Auxiliary enterprises3.0%

Where each dollar of revenue comes from, as a share of total positive revenue. Sources are standardized across public (GASB) and private (FASB) reporting; a net investment loss in a down market is shown as 0% and excluded from the mix.

Financial Health

The bar under each rank is the spread across the peer group: the shaded box is the middle half, the pale line is their median, and the gold marker is this institution. Hover for the figures.

Net tuition revenue / FTECalculated from filings

Average

$7,437

50th percentile in peer grouppeer median $7,437

higher is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

▼ -42% steady

Instructional spend / FTECalculated from filings

Below peers

$1,727

5th percentile in peer grouppeer median $9,410

higher is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

▼ -28% choppy · turning

In-state tuition & feesAs filed

$11,960

69th percentile in peer grouppeer median $10,320

context, not scored

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

▲ +8% choppy · turning

Out-of-state tuition & feesAs filed

$11,960

5th percentile in peer grouppeer median $19,576

context, not scored

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Avg annual cost of attendanceAs filed

$37,594

98th percentile in peer grouppeer median $24,188

context, not scored

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Avg monthly faculty salaryAs filed

Below peers

$7,113

5th percentile in peer grouppeer median $9,069

higher is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Average monthly salary of full-time faculty, as reported to IPEDS.

Average net priceAs filed

Below peers

$31,266

95th percentile in peer grouppeer median $13,315

lower is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Net price, low-income families (under $30K)As filed

Below peers

$31,009

95th percentile in peer grouppeer median $9,378

lower is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Average annual net price (cost of attendance minus all grant and scholarship aid) paid by students whose families earn under about $30,000 a year (College Scorecard, 2024-25). This is what the neediest admitted students actually pay, often far below the sticker price. Read it beside the overall net price and the high-income net price: a low figure here signals strong need-based aid. Lower is better.

Net price, high-income families (over $110K)As filed

$33,593

95th percentile in peer grouppeer median $19,180

context, not scored

2024-25 (Scorecard)30 peers

Average annual net price paid by students whose families earn more than about $110,000 a year (College Scorecard, 2024-25), close to the full-pay cost since little need-based aid applies. Reported as context: the gap between this and the low-income net price shows how steeply the school discounts by family income. Not a measure of quality.

Net price, middle-income families ($30K-$48K)As filed

Below peers

$31,862

98th percentile in peer grouppeer median $9,894

lower is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Average annual net price (cost of attendance minus all grant and scholarship aid) paid by students whose families earn roughly $30,000 to $48,000 a year (College Scorecard, 2024-25). It is the middle rung of the income net-price ladder: read it together with the low-income (under ~$30K) and high-income (over ~$110K) net prices to see how steeply the school discounts as family income rises. Lower is better.

Net price, upper-middle families ($48K-$75K)As filed

Below peers

$33,319

98th percentile in peer grouppeer median $12,103

lower is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)30 peers

Average annual net price (cost of attendance minus all grant and scholarship aid) paid by students whose families earn roughly $48,000 to $75,000 a year (College Scorecard, 2024-25). It is the fourth rung of the five-rung income net-price ladder: read it with the low, middle, upper and high-income net prices to see how steeply the school discounts as family income rises. Lower is better.

Net price, upper-income families ($75K-$110K)As filed

Below peers

$32,953

95th percentile in peer grouppeer median $17,032

lower is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)30 peers

Average annual net price (cost of attendance minus all grant and scholarship aid) paid by students whose families earn roughly $75,000 to $110,000 a year (College Scorecard, 2024-25). It is the fifth rung of the income net-price ladder, just below the full-pay tier: read it with the lower rungs and the high-income net price to see the full cost gradient by family income. Lower is better.

Operating marginCalculated from filings

Strong

11%

76th percentile in peer grouppeer median 2.3%

higher is better

FY2022-2331 peers

Net surplus as a share of total revenue (IPEDS FY2022-23): (total revenues − total expenses) ÷ total revenues. A surplus above 4% is strong; a thin surplus near 0% leaves little margin for shocks.

Tuition dependencyCalculated from filings

79.3%

92nd percentile in peer grouppeer median 30.1%

context, not scored

FY2022-2331 peers

Tuition & fees as a share of total revenue (IPEDS FY2022-23). Higher = more exposed to enrollment swings.

Avg Parent PLUS loanAs filed

$12,178

24th percentile in peer grouppeer median $13,060

context, not scored

AY2025-26 YTD (Federal Student Aid)31 peers

Average federal Parent PLUS loan per recipient (U.S. Dept. of Education, FSA Direct Loan Dashboard, AY2025-26 YTD). Parent PLUS faces new aggregate borrowing caps under the 2025 budget law; a high average shows how far families currently borrow above other federal aid. Companion to the Grad PLUS and Parent PLUS cap-gap signals. Context, not a quality measure. From the Federal Student Aid Direct Loan dashboard for award year 2025-26, year-to-date through Q2. A partial year, so it is not comparable with a full-year total.

Full-professor average salaryAs filed

Below peers

$76,913

5th percentile in peer grouppeer median $100,018

higher is better

2023-2430 peers

Average salary paid to full professors, the most senior instructional rank (IPEDS Human Resources, 2023-24, 9-month equated). It reflects both the school's pay scale and the seniority of its faculty, and it is a sizeable share of academic cost. Banded against the school's peer group.

Heightened Cash MonitoringRegulator / auditor finding

HCM1

Mar 2026 (Federal Student Aid)

The U.S. Department of Education places schools with financial-responsibility or compliance concerns on Heightened Cash Monitoring. HCM1 requires extra documentation before drawing federal aid; HCM2 is the more severe tier, paying the school only by reimbursement after it has disbursed its own funds. Shown only for currently flagged schools; most institutions are not on the list. A red flag for closure or solvency risk.

Grad PLUS exposureCalculated from filings

Low exposure

9.5%

AY2025-26 YTD (through Q2, Dec 2025)

Share of the institution's graduate federal loan dollars (Grad Unsubsidized + Grad PLUS) that came from Grad PLUS, the program the 2025 budget law eliminates for new borrowers from July 1, 2026, alongside new caps on graduate borrowing. A higher share means more of the school's graduate students rely on borrowing that will no longer exist above the unsubsidized cap. Source: U.S. Dept. of Education / Federal Student Aid Direct Loan Dashboard, primarily award year 2025-26 (year-to-date through Q2, December 2025), the most current federal data; schools not yet reporting Grad PLUS in 2025-26 retain their most recent complete year (2024-25), shown per school. The reliance share is stable across the two vintages. Shown only for schools with Grad PLUS originations; an exposure signal, not a forecast of revenue loss. Federal Student Aid publishes this dashboard quarterly and schools report on different schedules, so each school is shown at its own most recent reported period. Each school is shown at its own most recent filing, so the peer comparison spans a few filing years rather than a single one.

Avg Grad PLUS loanAs filed

Half the cap+

$17,340

AY2025-26 YTD (through Q2, Dec 2025)

Average Grad PLUS loan per recipient (FSA Direct Loan Dashboard, award year 2025-26 year-to-date through Q2, with 2024-25 full-year retained where 2025-26 is not yet reported). The 2025 budget law eliminates Grad PLUS for new borrowers from July 1, 2026 and caps unsubsidized graduate borrowing at $20,500/year, so this is the average per-borrower amount that will no longer be available above that cap. Paired with Grad PLUS exposure (the institution's reliance share), it is the depth axis of the Grad PLUS shock: how much each affected borrower stands to lose. Shown only where Grad PLUS was originated. Federal Student Aid publishes this dashboard quarterly and schools report on different schedules, so each school is shown at its own most recent reported period. Each school is shown at its own most recent filing, so the peer comparison spans a few filing years rather than a single one.

Structural risk indexBlended index

Elevated

FY2022-23 (IPEDS) with WICHE 2024 projections

An indicative 0–100 structural-risk index (higher = more pressure), an equal-weight blend of the stress signals we measure: thin or negative operating margin, low months of operating cushion, high tuition dependency, and a shrinking home-state high-school-graduate pipeline (enrollment cliff). Averaged over whichever signals are available (at least two required). It screens for the financial and demographic pressures that precede closures and mergers, a directional indicator, NOT a prediction that any institution will close, and not a credit rating. Built from the FY2022-23 IPEDS finance filing, the most recent one published, combined with WICHE's high-school-graduate projections. The finance side is two to three years old, so a school that has since raised money, cut costs or lost enrollment will not be reflected here. It is a structural signal, not a current diagnosis, and it is not a prediction that any named institution will close.

Enrollment loss before deficitModelled by Ibex

Some cushion

13.9%

56th percentile in peer grouppeer median 7.2%

higher is better

FY2022-2331 peers

The share of its students an institution could lose before its operating surplus becomes a deficit, assuming net tuition per student and total costs stay where they are. It comes straight from two figures in the same IPEDS finance filing: the operating margin, and tuition's share of total revenue. A school with a 3% surplus that funds 85% of itself from tuition can absorb about a 3.5% enrollment loss; the same 3% surplus at a school funding a quarter of itself from tuition absorbs about 12%. Zero means the institution is already running a deficit. It is not a prediction: no institution facing that loss would hold costs flat, and the number is the size of the hole that would have to be closed, not the outcome. Banded against the school's peer group. Higher is better.

Operating margin after a 10% enrollment lossModelled by Ibex

Still in surplus

3.3%

69th percentile in peer grouppeer median -0.9%

higher is better

FY2022-2331 peers

The institution's operating margin recomputed after losing one student in ten, holding net tuition per student and total costs constant. Tuition revenue falls with the students; every other revenue line and the whole cost base stay put. A tenth is the scale of decline the demographic projections already put on several states' high-school graduating classes, so it is a scenario rather than a worst case. Not a forecast: a real institution would cut costs, and this measures the gap it would have to cut, not what it would end up reporting. Built from the operating margin and tuition dependency in the same IPEDS filing. Banded against the school's peer group. Higher is better.

Graduation & completion

Graduation rate · first-time, full-time

10.7%

10.7% graduate within 6 years (150% of normal time)
2.7% on-time, within 4 years (100%)
Counts only students who entered full-time as first-time freshmen and earned a bachelor's here, the conventional headline rate. Excludes part-time entrants and transfer-ins.

Completion rate · all students

19.2%

19.2% earned a degree or certificate within 8 years (IPEDS Outcome Measures)
The broader cohort, also counts part-time entrants and transfer-ins, and any credential. More inclusive, so it can run higher than the graduation rate.

Why two numbers? They measure different students over different windows, so they are not directly comparable. The graduation rate is the standard federal headline but tracks only first-time, full-time students through a bachelor's; the all-students completion rate adds the part-time and transfer students it leaves out, over a longer window. Read each for what it covers. Source: U.S. Department of Education, IPEDS Graduation Rates & Outcome Measures, via College Scorecard.

Enrollment & Pipeline

The bar under each rank is the spread across the peer group: the shaded box is the middle half, the pale line is their median, and the gold marker is this institution. Hover for the figures.

Undergraduate enrollmentAs filed

20,152

95th percentile in peer grouppeer median 8,106

context, not scored

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

▼ -43% choppy

First-year retentionAs filed

Below peers

34.7%

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median 75.5%

higher is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

▲ +44% steady

Graduation rate (6-yr · first-time, full-time)As filed

Below peers

10.7%

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median 49.5%

higher is better

2024-25 (Scorecard) · cohort of 3,20330 peers

▲ +24% choppy

Share of first-time, full-time degree-seeking freshmen who earned a bachelor's at this institution within six years (150% of normal time), per College Scorecard. The number of students in the entering cohort is shown under the figure. Where that cohort is smaller than 30 students no rate is published: a graduation rate over a handful of students moves by whole percentage points per student and is not a result.

Graduation rate (4-yr on-time · first-time, full-time)As filed

Below peers

2.7%

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median 33.2%

higher is better

2024-25 (Scorecard) · cohort of 2,85329 peers

Share of first-time, full-time degree-seeking freshmen who earned a bachelor's within four years (100% of normal time), per College Scorecard. The number of students in the entering cohort is shown under the figure, and no rate is published on a cohort smaller than 30. This rate and the six-year rate are measured on classes that entered two years apart, so at a school whose outcomes are moving they will not always fall in the order you would expect.

Pell recipient shareAs filed

32.1%

27th percentile in peer grouppeer median 38%

context, not scored

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

▼ -41% steady

Completion rate (all students · 8-yr)As filed

Below peers

19.2%

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median 54.6%

higher is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of ALL entering degree-seeking undergraduates, full- and part-time, first-time and transfer-in, who earned a degree or certificate at this institution within eight years (IPEDS Outcome Measures, via College Scorecard). Broader and more inclusive than the graduation-rate figures, which count only first-time, full-time students entering a bachelor's program, so the two are measured on different groups of students and are not directly comparable.

First-generation studentsAs filed

54.3%

98th percentile in peer grouppeer median 35.9%

context, not scored

2016-17 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of undergraduates who are first-generation college students (College Scorecard, 2016-17). An access signal, not a measure of quality: a higher share often reflects a stronger commitment to serving students whose parents did not attend college. From the College Scorecard 2016-17 data file, built from aid-applicant records rather than the full student body, and not republished since.

Adult learners (25+)As filed

86.4%

95th percentile in peer grouppeer median 14.9%

context, not scored

2023-24 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of undergraduates aged 25 or older (College Scorecard, 2023-24). Read as context on the student mix: schools serving many working adults look different on persistence and part-time measures than traditional-age campuses, and neither is inherently better. From the College Scorecard 2023-24 data file.

Part-time undergraduatesAs filed

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median 14.8%

context, not scored

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of undergraduates enrolled part-time (College Scorecard, 2024-25). Context, not quality: a high part-time share is common at community and commuter institutions and affects graduation-rate comparisons, which are based only on full-time, first-time students.

Military veteransAs filed

1.9%

90th percentile in peer grouppeer median 0.5%

context, not scored

2016-17 (Scorecard)24 peers

Share of the student body who are military veterans (College Scorecard, 2016-17). A context signal on whom the school serves; reported by a minority of institutions, so many schools show none. From the College Scorecard 2016-17 data file, built from aid-applicant records rather than the full student body, and not republished since.

Median family incomeAs filed

$17,066

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median $37,082

context, not scored

2016-17 (Scorecard)31 peers

Median family income of students at this institution (College Scorecard, 2016-17). An affordability and access signal, not a measure of quality: a lower figure typically means the school enrolls more students from modest-income families. From the College Scorecard 2016-17 data file, built from aid-applicant records rather than the full student body, and not republished since.

Low-income students (under $30K)As filed

72.8%

98th percentile in peer grouppeer median 40.7%

context, not scored

2016-17 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of students whose families earn under roughly $30,000 a year (College Scorecard, 2016-17). A direct low-income access signal: a higher share usually reflects a school enrolling more students from modest-income households, and pairs naturally with the Pell recipient share. From the College Scorecard 2016-17 data file, built from aid-applicant records rather than the full student body, and not republished since.

Women (share of undergraduates)As filed

61%

52nd percentile in peer grouppeer median 61%

context, not scored

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of undergraduates who are women (College Scorecard, 2024-25). Reported as context on the student mix, not a measure of quality.

Middle-income students ($30K-$75K)As filed

22.8%

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median 32.1%

context, not scored

2016-17 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of students whose families earn roughly $30,000 to $75,000 a year (College Scorecard, 2016-17), the two middle income bands combined. Reported as context on the student mix: together with the low-income (under ~$30K) and upper-income (over ~$75K) shares it sketches the full family-income picture, and the three bands sum to about 100%. From the College Scorecard 2016-17 data file, built from aid-applicant records rather than the full student body, and not republished since.

Upper-income students (over $75K)As filed

4.4%

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median 26.1%

context, not scored

2016-17 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of students whose families earn more than roughly $75,000 a year (College Scorecard, 2016-17), the two upper income bands combined. Reported as context on the student mix, not a measure of quality: together with the low-income (under ~$30K) and middle-income (~$30K-$75K) shares it sketches the full family-income picture, and the three bands sum to about 100%. From the College Scorecard 2016-17 data file, built from aid-applicant records rather than the full student body, and not republished since.

Transfer-out rateAs filed

19.5%

44th percentile in peer grouppeer median 23.3%

context, not scored

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of students who transfer OUT to a different institution within the tracking window (College Scorecard, 2024-25). Reported as context, not a quality measure: it runs high at access-oriented schools and two-year feeders whose students routinely move on to a four-year program, and it should be read together with the completion and retention figures rather than on its own.

Program concentration (HHI)Calculated from filings

Highly concentrated

2,554

2022-23

How concentrated the institution's degree and certificate output is across academic fields (CIP 2-digit families), as a Herfindahl-Hirschman Index on the latest year's completions: 10,000 means every completion is in one field; lower means output is spread across many. A higher value means the school leans on fewer fields and is more exposed to demand shifts in them; a lower value reflects a broad program portfolio. Shown for institutions reporting at least 100 annual completions. A structural-diversification signal, not a measure of quality.

12-month FTE enrollmentAs filed

21,704

95th percentile in peer grouppeer median 9,827

context, not scored

2023-24 (IPEDS)31 peers

Full-time-equivalent enrollment over the full 12-month year (IPEDS 12-month enrollment, 2023-24). Counts part-time students at their fractional load, so it runs above fall full-time headcount and is the denominator used for per-student finance measures.

Student-faculty ratioAs filed

16:1

39th percentile in peer grouppeer median 17:1

context, not scored

Fall 202331 peers

Students per instructional faculty member (IPEDS, fall 2023). Lower generally means smaller classes and more faculty contact, though the measure mixes undergraduate and graduate teaching and is institution-reported.

Fully online studentsAs filed

100%

95th percentile in peer grouppeer median 20%

context, not scored

Fall 2023 (IPEDS)31 peers

Share of students enrolled exclusively in distance-education courses (IPEDS, Fall 2023). Describes delivery model, not quality; online-heavy institutions look different on residential measures.

Applicant-pool diversity shiftModelled by Ibex

+6.5 pts

WICHE 2024 (11th ed.)

Percentage-point change in the non-white share of the institution's home-state public high-school graduating class between the class of 2025 (the national peak) and 2037 (WICHE, Knocking at the College Door, 11th ed., public-school race detail). A forward look at who the future applicant pool will be: a positive value means the state's graduating class is projected to grow more racially diverse. Strategic recruiting context, not a forecast of any one school's enrollment, and a college recruits from many states.

Hybrid (some online) enrollmentAs filed

5th percentile in peer grouppeer median 34%

context, not scored

Fall 202331 peers

Share of all students taking some, but not all, of their courses at a distance (IPEDS, Fall 2023). This is the hybrid middle ground between the fully online share and the fully in-person share, and it signals how far a school has moved coursework online without going exclusively remote. Context metric, not better or worse. Shown as a position within the peer group, not as a score.

Transfer-in share (undergraduate)As filed

50th percentile in peer grouppeer median 9%

context, not scored

Fall 202331 peers

Transfer-in students as a share of all undergraduates (IPEDS, Fall 2023). A high share means the school depends on transfer pipelines rather than first-time freshmen, which changes both recruitment strategy and melt/retention risk. Context metric, not better or worse. Shown as a position within the peer group, not as a score.

Graduate share of enrollmentAs filed

23.5%

60th percentile in peer grouppeer median 19.7%

context, not scored

Fall 202331 peers

Graduate students as a share of total headcount enrollment (IPEDS, Fall 2023). It separates research-intensive universities with large graduate bodies from undergraduate-focused institutions. Context metric, not better or worse. Shown as a position within the peer group, not as a score.

Women share of facultyAs filed

60%

76th percentile in peer grouppeer median 56.8%

context, not scored

Fall 202331 peers

Women as a share of all instructional staff, full- and part-time combined (IPEDS Human Resources, Fall 2023). A gender-composition signal for the teaching workforce. Context metric, not better or worse. Shown as a position within the peer group, not as a score.

Faculty of color shareAs filed

26.4%

73rd percentile in peer grouppeer median 19.3%

context, not scored

Fall 202331 peers

Instructional staff who are American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Black, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, or two-or-more races, as a share of all instructional staff (IPEDS Human Resources, Fall 2023). Nonresident and race-unknown staff are excluded from the numerator. Context metric, not better or worse. Shown as a position within the peer group, not as a score.

Direct competitors within 100 miCalculated from filings

Below peers

74th percentile in peer grouppeer median 1

lower is better

2024-25 (Scorecard universe)31 peers

How many institutions of the same type (same Carnegie classification and control, i.e. the schools competing for the same students) sit within roughly 100 miles. A higher count means a more crowded local market and a harder yield fight, which matters most as the regional pool of high school graduates shrinks; a low count means the school has its catchment largely to itself. Distance is straight-line from campus coordinates. Banded against the school's peer group. Fewer is better for recruiting leverage.

States recruited fromCalculated from filings

Average

48th percentile in peer grouppeer median 24

higher is better

Fall 202230 peers

How many distinct US states the school's first-time degree-seeking class is drawn from (IPEDS Residence & Migration, Fall 2022). A higher count signals broader geographic reach and less dependence on any single state's shrinking pool of high school graduates; a low count means the school recruits from a narrow region and is more exposed to that region's demographic decline. Banded against the school's peer group.

Foreign first-time shareAs filed

13th percentile in peer grouppeer median 0.4%

context, not scored

Fall 202230 peers

Share of the school's first-time degree-seeking class whose legal residence is outside the United States (IPEDS Residence & Migration, Fall 2022). A measure of international reach in the entering class. Neither high nor low is inherently better; it is context for tuition-revenue mix and exposure to visa and geopolitical risk. Shown as a position within the peer group, not as a score.

Metro-area unemployment rateAs filed

Below peers

6.2%

80th percentile in peer grouppeer median 5%

lower is better

ACS 2019-2330 peers

The civilian unemployment rate in the school's metropolitan or micropolitan area (US Census ACS 2019-23, mapped by the school's federal CBSA code). It is a proxy for local labor demand: a lower rate means a tighter job market, a stronger near-term destination for graduates and a smaller pool of working adults to recruit. It describes the local economy, not the school. Schools outside any metro area are not scored. Banded against the school's peer group.

Enrollment cliff (home state)External projection

Moderate decline

-4.9%

WICHE 2024 (11th ed.) projection

Projected change in the number of high-school graduates in the institution's HOME STATE from the class of 2025 (the national peak) to 2041, per WICHE's Knocking at the College Door, 11th Edition (Dec 2024). The 'enrollment cliff' is the post-2008 birth decline reaching college age; the U.S. total is projected to fall about 13% over this window. A college recruits from many states, so its home-state projection is an indicative directional signal of feeder-market pressure, not a forecast of that institution's own enrollment. A projection, not a measurement: WICHE's state-level forecast of high-school graduates. It describes the pool a school recruits from, not the school's own enrollment.

Shown exactly as the institution filed it. The value falls outside the normal range for this measure, which usually means a reporting quirk rather than a real figure, so read it with care.

In-state HS graduatesExternal projection

85,639

44th percentile in peer grouppeer median 104,326

context, not scored

Class of 2025 (WICHE)31 peers

The size of the school's home-state high-school graduating class in 2025 (WICHE Knocking at the College Door, public and private combined). It is the near-term in-state feeder market, the complement to the enrollment-cliff projection, which shows the direction that market is heading. Context metric, not better or worse. Shown as a position within the peer group, not as a score.

Enrollment momentum (CAGR)Modelled by Ibex

Below peers

-6.8%

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median -2.5%

higher is better

2016-17 to 2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Compound annual growth rate of undergraduate enrollment over the years the tool tracks (College Scorecard, roughly 2016-2024). Positive means the school is growing; negative means it is shrinking, the leading indicator of demand stress ahead of the demographic cliff. Where the reported count jumps by a merger or a campus consolidation brought under one institution, only the years after that jump are measured, and where too little history follows it no rate is shown. A sharp fall is measured in full: a shrinking count is the signal this metric exists to carry, not an artifact to be cut away. No rate is shown where the enrolment never reaches 25 in the measured window: on a series that small one student is a double-digit annual rate, and a percentile computed from it would rank noise. Banded against the school's peer group. The window shown is the one this school's own figure was measured over: it is shorter where the series starts late, ends early, or is cut at a reporting change, so peers are not all measured over identical years.

Shown exactly as the institution filed it. The value falls outside the normal range for this measure, which usually means a reporting quirk rather than a real figure, so read it with care.

Net-price momentum (CAGR)Modelled by Ibex

Strong

-6.5%

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median 0.5%

lower is better

2016-17 to 2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Compound annual growth rate of net tuition revenue per full-time-equivalent student over the tracked years. A high positive rate means the school's real net price is climbing faster than peers, which can strain affordability and yield. Banded against the school's peer group. Lower is better. The window shown is the one this school's own figure was measured over: it is shorter where the series starts late, ends early, or is cut at a reporting change, so peers are not all measured over identical years.

Shown exactly as the institution filed it. The value falls outside the normal range for this measure, which usually means a reporting quirk rather than a real figure, so read it with care.

Enrollment forecast (5-yr)Modelled by Ibex

Below peers

-22.3%

18th percentile in peer grouppeer median -12.9%

higher is better

2024-2029 projection31 peers

Projected cumulative change in degree-seeking undergraduate enrollment roughly five years out, modeled by a least-squares log-linear fit on the school's own undergraduate history (IPEDS fall headcount via College Scorecard, 2016-2024). It uses the full multi-year series, so a single shock year (such as 2020) does not drive the result. Where the reported count jumps by a merger or a campus consolidation brought under one institution, only the years after that jump are fitted; a sharp fall is fitted in full. This is a naive trend extrapolation, not a demographic model: where it projects a change beyond plus or minus 60 percent the fit is treated as out of range and no figure is shown. Banded against the school's peer group; higher means projected growth. The window shown is the one this school's own figure was measured over: it is shorter where the series starts late, ends early, or is cut at a reporting change, so peers are not all measured over identical years.

Shown exactly as the institution filed it. The value falls outside the normal range for this measure, which usually means a reporting quirk rather than a real figure, so read it with care.

Competing enrollment nearbyCalculated from filings

Average

0.22×

53rd percentile in peer grouppeer median 0.20×

lower is better

2024-25 (Scorecard universe)31 peers

For every undergraduate enrolled here, how many are enrolled at directly competing institutions (same Carnegie classification and control) within roughly 100 miles. It is the weight behind the competitor count on the neighbouring card: three tiny colleges nearby and one 40,000-student public are the same number of competitors and a completely different market. A value of 5x means the surrounding same-type market is five times this school's size, so a small shift in where those students choose to go moves this school's class far more than it moves theirs. Straight-line distance from campus coordinates, same 100-mile catchment as the competitor count. Banded against the school's peer group. Lower means more room to grow without taking students from a larger rival.

Consecutive years of enrollment declineModelled by Ibex

3+ years down

4 yrs

89th percentile in peer grouppeer median 0 yrs

lower is better

2016-17 to 2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

The number of consecutive years, ending with the most recent one, in which this school's undergraduate headcount fell. Zero means the latest year was flat or up. A single down year is ordinary; three or more in a row is the pattern that precedes program cuts and closures, and it is visible in the federal data years before it becomes public. A fall smaller than 2% counts as flat, because year-to-year reporting noise at that scale would otherwise manufacture streaks. Measured on the same window as enrollment momentum: where a merger or consolidation makes the earlier years a different institution, only the years after it are counted. Banded against the school's peer group. Lower is better. The window shown is the one this school's own figure was measured over: it is shorter where the series starts late, ends early, or is cut at a reporting change, so peers are not all measured over identical years.

Where students come from

Feeder states 25 states and territories · Fall 2022

CA 15.8%AZ 8.8%TX 8.8%FL 7.0%GA 7.0%

Home state of first-time degree-seeking undergraduates (IPEDS residence and migration). Each state is one square of equal size, arranged in the rough shape of the country, so a small state sending many students is as visible as a large one. The institution’s own state is shown in gold and every other state is shaded against the largest of them, not against the home state, which otherwise flattens the rest of the map. Shares are of the whole entering class, so they do not add to 100% where students came from abroad.

Completion equity

Six-year graduation rate by group First-time, full-time bachelor’s cohort · Scorecard 2024-25

White12% n=1544

Black8% n=888

Hispanic/Latino11% n=496

Two or more races7% n=120

Pell recipients11% n=1970

Six-year graduation rate (150% of normal time) for the first-time, full-time bachelor’s cohort, broken out by race and ethnicity and for Pell-grant recipients (College Scorecard). Each bar uses the same measure and the same single-year cohort as the headline graduation rate, so the gaps between groups are directly comparable. A group with fewer than 30 students in the cohort is not shown: a rate over a handful of students is noise, and n is printed beside every bar so the reader can judge the rest. School overall: 11% (n=3203).

Completion by income and entry path

Where the Pell gap actually sits eight-year award rate · 2024-25

Entering group	Pell recipients	Not Pell	Gap
All entering studentsEveryone who enrolled as a degree-seeking undergraduate, however they arrived.	17%n=14,815	22%n=13,271	+4.9 pts
Entered as first-timeStudents with no prior college enrollment.	11%n=1,872	10%n=1,751	-0.9 pts
Entered with prior collegeTransfer-in and returning students.	18%n=12,943	23%n=11,520	+5.8 pts

Federal Outcome Measures: the share of entering degree-seeking undergraduates who had earned an award eight years later, counting part-time students and transfers that the headline graduation rate leaves out. A positive gap means Pell recipients finished less often. Rates are shown only where at least 30 students entered on that side, because a rate over a handful of students is arithmetic rather than a measurement, so a row can be blank on one side. Race crossed with Pell is not published by any federal collection and is deliberately not estimated here.

Student body

Undergraduate race & ethnicity IPEDS 2024-25

White37.0%

Black29.4%

Hispanic/Latino21.5%

Two or more races4.7%

Unknown3.0%

Asian2.5%

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander1.0%

American Indian/Alaska Native0.8%

International0.2%

Undergraduate enrollment by race and ethnicity, as reported to IPEDS (College Scorecard). “International” denotes nonresident students; “Unknown” means race/ethnicity was not reported.

Student Outcomes & Risk

The bar under each rank is the spread across the peer group: the shaded box is the middle half, the pale line is their median, and the gold marker is this institution. Hover for the figures.

Median earnings (10 yr)As filed

Below peers

$35,404

5th percentile in peer grouppeer median $50,220

higher is better

2020-21 (Scorecard)31 peers

Taken from the College Scorecard 2020-21 data file, the most recent release in which the Department published this element; it is null in every release since. Earnings are measured in a single tax year for a cohort that first enrolled about a decade earlier, so this describes students who entered well before 2020.

Median debt at graduationAs filed

Below peers

$31,250

98th percentile in peer grouppeer median $21,992

lower is better

2020-21 (Scorecard)31 peers

▼ -6% steady

From the College Scorecard 2020-21 data file, the last release carrying it. Median debt pools the borrowers who left in that award year and the one before it.

3-yr cohort default rateAs filed

Below peers

14.7%

95th percentile in peer grouppeer median 7.2%

lower is better

FY2017 cohort31 peers

Share of borrowers who defaulted within three years of entering repayment (U.S. Dept. of Education official cohort default rate). Shown for the FY2017 borrower cohort, the most recent cohort whose full three-year default window closed before the 2020-23 federal student-loan payment pause. More recent cohorts are reported by the College Scorecard at essentially 0%, but that reflects the payment pause (no payments were due, so almost no one could default), not borrower health, so the pre-pause cohort is the last meaningful reading. Lower is better.

Share taking federal loansAs filed

33.2%

27th percentile in peer grouppeer median 38%

context, not scored

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Full-time faculty shareAs filed

Below peers

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median 67.1%

higher is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Debt-to-earnings ratioCalculated from filings

Below peers

0.88×

95th percentile in peer grouppeer median 0.44×

lower is better

2020-21 (Scorecard)31 peers

Both sides of this ratio come from the College Scorecard 2020-21 data file, the last release carrying either. It is co-vintage, but it is not current.

Loan repayment rate (3-yr)As filed

Below peers

24.6%

5th percentile in peer grouppeer median 54.7%

higher is better

2016-17 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of student-loan borrowers who had repaid at least $1 of their loan principal within three years of entering repayment (College Scorecard, 2016-17). Read it as context, not a simple good/bad score: a low rate can mean borrowers are struggling, but it can also mean many graduates have postponed payments while enrolled in graduate or professional school, which is common at selective schools and pushes their rate down. Unlike the cohort default rate, it is not distorted by the 2020-23 federal payment pause. Reported only where enough borrowers exist. From the College Scorecard 2016-17 data file. The Department has not published repayment rates since, so this is the most recent figure that exists, not a recent one: it follows borrowers who entered repayment in the early 2010s.

Earn more than a HS grad (6-yr)Calculated from filings

Below peers

50.8%

18th percentile in peer grouppeer median 59.5%

higher is better

2014-15 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of students earning more than $28,000 a year, roughly what a typical high-school graduate earns, six years after entering this institution (College Scorecard, 2014-15). A direct read on whether attending beats not attending, and conceptually aligned with the 2025 budget law's program-level earnings-premium test. Share of former students earning more than $28,000, the Department's benchmark for the median earnings of a high-school graduate. From the College Scorecard 2014-15 data file, the last release carrying it; the threshold is not inflation-adjusted.

Working 10 years after entryAs filed

Below peers

74.5%

5th percentile in peer grouppeer median 89.1%

higher is better

2020-21 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of students who are working (not still enrolled) ten years after entering this institution, of those whose employment status is known (College Scorecard, 2020-21). A coarse employment signal; it does not capture earnings level or job quality. Taken from the College Scorecard 2020-21 data file, the most recent release in which the Department published this element; it is null in every release since. Earnings are measured in a single tax year for a cohort that first enrolled about a decade earlier, so this describes students who entered well before 2020.

Withdrew by year 2As filed

Below peers

46.9%

98th percentile in peer grouppeer median 19.4%

lower is better

2019-20 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of students who had withdrawn from this institution by the end of their second year (College Scorecard, 2019-20). An early-attrition signal, where lower is better; high part-time or adult-learner enrollment can raise it without reflecting institutional quality. From the College Scorecard 2019-20 data file, the last release carrying it.

Loan repayment rate (5-yr)As filed

Below peers

29.3%

5th percentile in peer grouppeer median 59.8%

higher is better

2016-17 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of student-loan borrowers who had repaid at least $1 of their loan principal within five years of entering repayment (College Scorecard, 2016-17), a longer-horizon companion to the three-year repayment rate. As with the three-year figure, a low rate can reflect graduates deferring payments while in further schooling rather than financial distress. From the College Scorecard 2016-17 data file. The Department has not published repayment rates since, so this is the most recent figure that exists, not a recent one: it follows borrowers who entered repayment in the early 2010s.

Median earnings (6 yr)As filed

Below peers

$33,397

8th percentile in peer grouppeer median $43,085

higher is better

2020-21 (Scorecard)31 peers

Median earnings of former students who are working and were federally aided, measured six years after they first enrolled (College Scorecard, 2020-21). A shorter-horizon companion to the ten-year earnings figure; early-career pay tends to run below the ten-year mark, so read the two together rather than in isolation. From the College Scorecard 2020-21 data file, the last release carrying it. Earnings measured about six years after entry, so the cohort behind it entered in the mid-2010s.

Earn more than a HS grad (10-yr)Calculated from filings

Average

68.9%

38th percentile in peer grouppeer median 70.3%

higher is better

2014-15 (Scorecard)30 peers

Share of students earning more than $28,000 a year, roughly what a typical high-school graduate earns, ten years after entering this institution (College Scorecard, 2014-15). The long-horizon companion to the six-year figure and the closest public analogue to the 2025 budget law's program-level earnings-premium test. Share of former students earning more than $28,000, the Department's benchmark for the median earnings of a high-school graduate. From the College Scorecard 2014-15 data file, the last release carrying it; the threshold is not inflation-adjusted.

Median debt (did not complete)As filed

Strong

$4,961

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median $8,763

lower is better

2020-21 (Scorecard)31 peers

Median federal loan debt carried by students who withdrew from this institution without completing a credential (College Scorecard, 2020-21). The counterpart to debt at graduation, and often the higher-risk group: borrowing with no degree to show for it. Lower is better, but compare it against the school's completion and withdrawal rates rather than on its own. From the College Scorecard 2020-21 data file, the last release carrying it. Median debt pools the borrowers who left in that award year and the one before it.

Loan repayment rate (1-yr)As filed

Below peers

18.7%

5th percentile in peer grouppeer median 48.6%

higher is better

2014-15 (Scorecard)31 peers

Share of student-loan borrowers who had repaid at least $1 of their loan principal within one year of entering repayment (College Scorecard, 2014-15), the earliest point on the repayment curve. As with the longer-horizon rates, a low figure can reflect borrowers deferring payments while in further schooling rather than financial distress. From the College Scorecard 2014-15 data file, the last release carrying the one-year repayment rate. A decade old, and shown because no newer federal figure exists.

Loan repayment rate (7-yr)As filed

Below peers

36.7%

8th percentile in peer grouppeer median 64.7%

higher is better

2016-17 (Scorecard)30 peers

Share of student-loan borrowers who had repaid at least $1 of their loan principal within seven years of entering repayment (College Scorecard, 2016-17), the longest horizon reported. Together with the one-, three-, and five-year rates it traces how repayment progresses over time. From the College Scorecard 2016-17 data file. The Department has not published repayment rates since, so this is the most recent figure that exists, not a recent one: it follows borrowers who entered repayment in the early 2010s.

Median debt (first-generation students)As filed

Strong

$9,500

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median $15,000

lower is better

2020-21 (Scorecard)31 peers

Median cumulative federal loan debt carried by first-generation students, those whose parents did not complete college (College Scorecard, 2020-21). Read it beside the all-students median debt: a gap between the two is an equity signal about who shoulders the borrowing. Lower is better, but weigh it against completion and earnings. From the College Scorecard 2020-21 data file, the last release carrying it. Median debt pools the borrowers who left in that award year and the one before it.

Median debt (Pell recipients)As filed

Strong

$9,654

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median $15,791

lower is better

2020-21 (Scorecard)31 peers

Median cumulative federal loan debt carried by Pell Grant recipients (College Scorecard, 2020-21), the lowest-income federally-aided students at the school. Compare it with the all-students median debt and the Pell share: it shows how much the neediest students borrow to attend. Lower is better. From the College Scorecard 2020-21 data file, the last release carrying it. Median debt pools the borrowers who left in that award year and the one before it.

Loan repayment rate, completers (3-yr)As filed

Below peers

42.1%

8th percentile in peer grouppeer median 69.6%

higher is better

2016-17 (Scorecard)31 peers

Three-year loan repayment rate among borrowers who completed their program (College Scorecard, 2016-17): the share who, three years after entering repayment, are not in default and have paid down at least a dollar of principal. Read it beside the all-borrower loan repayment rate and the non-completer rate: completers almost always repay at higher rates, so a low figure here is a strong warning sign. Higher is better. From the College Scorecard 2016-17 data file. The Department has not published repayment rates since, so this is the most recent figure that exists, not a recent one: it follows borrowers who entered repayment in the early 2010s.

Loan repayment rate, non-completers (3-yr)As filed

Below peers

19%

5th percentile in peer grouppeer median 44.7%

higher is better

2016-17 (Scorecard)31 peers

Three-year loan repayment rate among borrowers who left WITHOUT completing (College Scorecard, 2016-17), the group at the highest risk of default since they carry debt without the credential. Pair it with the non-completer median debt: together they show how heavily a school's dropouts are burdened. Higher is better. From the College Scorecard 2016-17 data file. The Department has not published repayment rates since, so this is the most recent figure that exists, not a recent one: it follows borrowers who entered repayment in the early 2010s.

Median earnings, low-income students (10-yr)As filed

Below peers

$30,277

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median $47,241

higher is better

2020-21 (Scorecard)31 peers

Median earnings ten years after entering, measured only for students who came from the lowest family-income tier, under about $30,000 a year (College Scorecard, 2020-21). Read it beside the overall median earnings: a school whose low-income students go on to earn near the all-student figure is delivering real upward mobility, while a large gap signals the payoff is not reaching its neediest students. Higher is better. Taken from the College Scorecard 2020-21 data file, the most recent release in which the Department published this element; it is null in every release since. Earnings are measured in a single tax year for a cohort that first enrolled about a decade earlier, so this describes students who entered well before 2020.

Median earnings, middle-income students (10-yr)As filed

Below peers

$48,588

24th percentile in peer grouppeer median $51,194

higher is better

2020-21 (Scorecard)31 peers

Median earnings ten years after entering, measured only for students from middle-income families, roughly $30,000 to $75,000 a year (College Scorecard, 2020-21). It is the middle rung of the earnings-by-family-income ladder: read it beside the low-income (under ~$30K) and high-income (over ~$75K) figures to see whether the school's payoff is even across backgrounds or tracks who students were when they arrived. Higher is better. Taken from the College Scorecard 2020-21 data file, the most recent release in which the Department published this element; it is null in every release since. Earnings are measured in a single tax year for a cohort that first enrolled about a decade earlier, so this describes students who entered well before 2020.

Median earnings, high-income students (10-yr)As filed

Strong

$62,126

92nd percentile in peer grouppeer median $54,992

higher is better

2020-21 (Scorecard)31 peers

Median earnings ten years after entering, measured only for students from higher-income families, over about $75,000 a year (College Scorecard, 2020-21). It is the top rung of the earnings-by-family-income ladder: the gap between this and the low-income figure shows how much the school's earnings payoff depends on family background. A narrow gap signals strong upward mobility. Higher is better. Taken from the College Scorecard 2020-21 data file, the most recent release in which the Department published this element; it is null in every release since. Earnings are measured in a single tax year for a cohort that first enrolled about a decade earlier, so this describes students who entered well before 2020.

Pell completion gapCalculated from filings

Strong

-0.2 pts

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median +6.2 pts

lower is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)29 peers

The school's overall six-year graduation rate minus the graduation rate of its Pell Grant recipients (College Scorecard). A larger positive gap means lower-income students complete at a lower rate than the student body overall; a value near zero means the school graduates Pell and non-Pell students at similar rates. Both sides come from the same single-year cohort and each must have at least 30 students for the school to appear here. Banded against the school's peer group. Smaller is better.

Black-White completion gapCalculated from filings

Strong

+4.2 pts

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median +16.9 pts

lower is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)21 peers

The school's White-student six-year graduation rate minus its Black-student rate (College Scorecard). A larger positive gap means Black students complete at a lower rate; a value near zero means the school closes that gap. Reported only where both groups make up a meaningful share of the student body AND each has at least 30 students in the cohort, so a handful of students in one subgroup cannot drive the number. Banded against the school's peer group. Smaller is better.

Debt-to-earnings rateCalculated from filings

Below peers

95th percentile in peer grouppeer median 0.7%

lower is better

Scorecard FoS (indicative)31 peers

The school's median program-level debt-to-earnings rate: the annual payment on graduates' median loan debt as a share of their median earnings, the core measure in the Department of Education's gainful-employment framework (a program is flagged above 8%). This is INDICATIVE: it applies ED's methodology to public College Scorecard field-of-study data because ED has not yet published its official determinations. Computed where the school has at least three evaluated programs. Lower means debt is smaller relative to earnings. Banded against peer group.

Field-demand outlook (10-yr)External projection

Outpaces job-market average

+3.4 pts

9th percentile nationallynational median +4.7 pts

higher is better

BLS EP 2024-34

Projected 10-year (2024-34) change in U.S. employment for the occupations this institution's degrees and certificates feed, blended across its program mix. Built by mapping each CIP 2-digit field to its occupations via the NCES CIP-SOC crosswalk, taking the employment-weighted average of each occupation's BLS-projected percent change, then weighting fields by the institution's latest-year completions. The U.S. all-occupations benchmark is 3.1%, so a higher value means the school's graduates concentrate in faster-growing labor markets. An INDICATIVE field-level signal at broad-field granularity, not a program-specific or graduate-specific projection, and not a placement or earnings guarantee. Shown where at least 50% of completions fall in fields with a coherent occupational mapping and the school reports 100+ annual completions.

Completions in growing fieldsExternal projection

Mixed field mix

33.2%

7th percentile nationallynational median 67.9%

higher is better

BLS EP 2024-34

The share of this institution's yearly completions that are in broad fields whose occupations the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects will grow FASTER than the all-occupations average of 3.1% over 2024-34. It answers a different question from the field-demand outlook beside it: that one averages the whole program mix into a single rate, which lets a fast-growing half cancel out a shrinking half. This says how much of the graduating class is on the growing side. The denominator is completions in fields with a coherent occupational mapping, not all completions, because three broad fields map to essentially the whole economy and carry no signal; the share of completions that could be classified at all is shown in the field-mix breakdown. Ranked against every institution in the file rather than against the peer group: what a program mix is worth is set by the national labour market, not by whichever schools happen to share a Carnegie class. An indicative field-level signal, not a placement rate.

Return on credentialCalculated from filings

Below peers

0.24×

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median 0.50×

higher is better

2020-21 to 2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

Median 10-year earnings divided by the four-year cost of attendance (average annual cost × 4). A rough payback ratio: 1.0× means a graduate's annual 10-year earnings roughly equal the full four-year sticker cost. Earnings reflect federally-aided students; cost of attendance is the published sticker price before aid, so this is conservative relative to what families net of aid pay.

Programs below earnings benchmarkModelled by Ibex

Below peers

11.5%

76th percentile in peer grouppeer median 7.1%

lower is better

2024-25 (Scorecard field of study)31 peers

Share of this school's measured program completions in programs whose median earnings four years after completion fall below the state benchmark (a high-school graduate's earnings for undergraduate credentials, a bachelor's for graduate credentials). This is the same early-warning screen behind our OBBBA Compliance Watchdog leaderboard, computed on public College Scorecard Field-of-Study data, not the official federal determination. Shown only where at least four programs report earnings. Lower is less exposure.

Net-value indexBlended index

Below peers

4.0

2nd percentile in peer grouppeer median 51.0

higher is better

2020-21 to 2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

A 0-100 composite of student value relative to the peer group: the average of peer percentile ranks for median earnings ten years out, graduation rate, net price (lower counts as better value) and median debt (lower is better). Built only where at least two components are reported. Higher means more outcome per dollar. Banded against the school's peer group.

Pell completion gap (all entrants)Calculated from filings

Average

+4.9 pts

35th percentile in peer grouppeer median +6.5 pts

lower is better

2024-25 (Scorecard)31 peers

The eight-year award rate of students who did not receive a Pell Grant minus the rate of those who did, measured over every entering degree-seeking undergraduate: part-time students and transfers included. A larger positive number means lower-income students finish less often. This is a different measurement from the Pell completion gap beside it, not a correction of it: that one uses the six-year rate for students who arrived first-time AND full-time, which at many open-access institutions is under a fifth of everyone who enrolls. Both are the school's own federal reporting, over different cohorts and different clocks, and the completion cross-tab shows where the gap actually sits. Banded against the school's peer group. Smaller is better. Shown only where at least 30 students entered on each side, because a rate over a handful of students is arithmetic rather than a measurement.

Loan payment vs earningsCalculated from filings

Stretched

12%

95th percentile in peer grouppeer median 6%

lower is better

2020-21 (Scorecard)31 peers

What this school's median federal student debt would cost to repay each month on the ten-year Standard Repayment Plan, divided by the median graduate's monthly earnings ten years after entering. Both figures are the school's own reported medians from the same College Scorecard file year, so the ratio compares like with like, but they describe different people: the typical borrower and the typical earner are not necessarily the same student. The payment is calculated at the current published undergraduate Direct Loan interest rate (6.39% for 2025-26), not at the rates the debt was originally borrowed at, so it answers what the debt would cost a student starting now. Payments above roughly 8% of gross income are the widely used threshold for strain, and above 15% the standard plan is usually unaffordable without an income-driven alternative. Banded against the school's peer group. Lower is better.

Program mix vs the job market

Where this year’s graduates are heading 9,522 completions · BLS EP 2024-34

32% of completions are in fields projected to grow faster than the job market as a whole; 1% are in fields projected to shrink.

Faster than average32.4%

Growing, but slower64.6%

Projected to shrink0.6%

No coherent occupation mapping2.5%

Each completion is placed by the broad field of its program, then by whether that field’s occupations are projected to grow faster than the all-occupations average, grow more slowly, or decline. Three broad fields map to essentially the whole economy and carry no field signal, so their completions are shown separately as unclassified rather than being counted either way. The “Completions in growing fields” figure above is 33.2% because it is measured against the 98% of completions that could be classified at all, not against all 9,522. Field-level and indicative: it describes the labour markets a program mix feeds, not what any individual graduate does.

Earnings spread

Earnings 10 years after entry: the middle 50% Working, federally-aided former students · Scorecard 2024-25

25th percentile$17,745

Median$35,404

75th percentile$55,420

Annual earnings of working former students measured ten years after they first enrolled (College Scorecard), shown as a range rather than a single number. The middle half of this school’s graduates earn between the 25th- and 75th-percentile figures; the Median bar matches the headline earnings figure. A wider gap means more variation in how graduates fare. Bars are scaled to the highest value shown.

Where these numbers come from

Every figure on this page carries one of these labels. They are not degrees of confidence: a projection is not a worse number than a filing, it is a different kind of claim, and the distinction is invisible when both are set in the same grey card.

As filedThis is the institution's own figure as filed with a federal collection, or a federal agency's own published figure about it. Ibex has not adjusted it.

Calculated from filingsCalculated by Ibex from figures in the same federal filing, using nothing but arithmetic: a share, a ratio, or an amount per student. It is exactly as sound as the filed numbers it divides.

Blended indexA blend of several other measures on this page, combined by Ibex. The components and how they are weighted are listed in this metric's description. Reasonable people could weight them differently and get a different score.

Modelled by IbexFitted or extrapolated by Ibex from the institution's reported history. This number appears in no federal file: it is a summary of a trend, and it inherits every irregularity in the years it was fitted through.

External projectionBuilt on an external projection about the future, published by a research body rather than measured. Projections are revised as the underlying assumptions change, and this one describes a scenario, not a fact.

Regulator / auditor findingA finding published by a regulator or an independent auditor about this institution. It is a statement someone made in writing, not a measurement Ibex or the school took.

Top fields of study (bachelor's)

The University of Arizona Global Campus’s largest fields by completions, with graduate earnings (4 years out) and debt benchmarked against the same field at its peer group. Sparklines show the 8-year completions trend.

Field	Completions / yr	Median earnings, 4 yrs out	Median debt	Earnings premium	Risk score
Business, Management & Marketing	2,860	$69,366 82nd pct · 31 peers	$34,449 95th pct · 31 peers	Above benchmark +89%	Moderate · 35
Education	870	$45,012 25th pct · 26 peers	$30,844 90th pct · 26 peers	Above benchmark +22%	Moderate · 50
Health Professions & Clinical Sciences	822	$51,380 5th pct · 29 peers	$33,096 95th pct · 30 peers	Above benchmark +40%	Moderate · 44
Psychology	490	$48,325 50th pct · 31 peers	$32,813 95th pct · 31 peers	Above benchmark +31%	Moderate · 49
Homeland Security, Law Enforcement & Firefighting	468	$60,144 85th pct · 23 peers	$31,380 98th pct · 23 peers	Above benchmark +63%	Moderate · 50
Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies	188	$45,456 22nd pct · 16 peers	$39,360 97th pct · 17 peers	Above benchmark +24%	Moderate · 52
Social Sciences	175	$50,595 41st pct · 28 peers	$28,669 95th pct · 28 peers	Above benchmark +38%	Moderate · 50
Computer & Information Sciences	134	–	–	–	Low · 0
Communication & Journalism	130	$54,048 80th pct · 28 peers	$34,914 98th pct · 28 peers	Above benchmark +47%	Moderate · 36
Family & Consumer Sciences	96	$44,852 25th pct · 10 peers	$27,470 95th pct · 10 peers	Above benchmark +22%	Moderate · 53

All 9 top fields shown clear the AZ state earnings-premium benchmark (indicative).

Earnings-premium status is an indicative estimate: median graduate earnings four years out vs the AZ state median earnings of a high-school graduate (undergraduate credentials) or a bachelor’s-degree holder (graduate credentials) from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (2022 ACS 5-year). The official U.S. Department of Education determination uses its own cohort definition and may differ.

The risk score (0–100) is an indicative blend of earnings-premium margin and the five-year completions trend, higher means a field pays closer to (or below) the benchmark and is shrinking. A directional screen, not an official determination.

Major-level detail (CIP 4-digit)

Business, Management & Marketing – 10 CIP programs (4-digit), 10 with earnings

Major (CIP 4-digit)	Compl./yr	Earn 4yr	Earn 1yr	% > threshold	Median debt	Debt/earn	Earnings premium	2 of 3 yrs
Business Administration, Management and OperationsCIP 5202 ›	1,934	$71,782 n=2,039	–	100%	$34,370	0.48×	Above benchmark +95%	Clears all 2 yrs
Human Resources Management and ServicesCIP 5210 ›	335	$65,002 n=367	–	94.3%	$36,139	0.56×	Above benchmark +77%	Clears all 2 yrs
Accounting and Related ServicesCIP 5203 ›	145	$61,522 n=235	–	100%	$32,813	0.53×	Above benchmark +67%	Clears all 2 yrs
Finance and Financial Management ServicesCIP 5208 ›	127	$64,426 n=96	–	94.8%	$29,813	0.46×	Above benchmark +75%	Clears all 2 yrs
Management Information Systems and ServicesCIP 5212 ›	94	$77,907 n=141	–	100%	$37,741	0.48×	Above benchmark +112%	Clears all 2 yrs
MarketingCIP 5214 ›	78	$66,307 n=84	–	100%	$37,625	0.57×	Above benchmark +80%	Clears all 2 yrs
Entrepreneurial and Small Business OperationsCIP 5207 ›	58	$43,140 n=87	–	56.3%	$34,478	0.80×	Above benchmark +17%	Below benchmark 1 of 2 yrs
Real EstateCIP 5215 ›	57	$58,733 n=52	–	73.8% 5yr	$32,803	0.56×	Above benchmark +60%	Clears all 2 yrs
Business/Managerial EconomicsCIP 5206 ›	17	$65,737 n=22	–	88.9% 5yr	$38,365	0.58×	Above benchmark +79%	Clears all 2 yrs
International BusinessCIP 5211 ›	15	$81,292 n=39	–	76.9% 5yr	$26,497	0.33×	Above benchmark +121%	Clears all 2 yrs

Major-level earnings, debt and threshold pass-rates are reported by College Scorecard only where enough graduates exist to protect privacy, so 10 of 10 majors show an earnings figure; the rest read “–”. % > threshold is ED’s own share of graduates out-earning the federal earnings threshold (the do-no-harm pass rate), drawn from the best available measurement window (4-, 5- or 1-year) pooled across all nine College Scorecard Field-of-Study releases; a small chip marks any figure not on the 4-year window, and hovering names the cohort size and source release. 2 of 3 yrs flags fields below the earnings-premium benchmark in two of the latest three reported cohort-years, the statutory trigger under the 2025 test (effective July 1, 2026). Indicative; the Department of Education’s official determination may differ. Source: U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard Field of Study (2014–15 through 2022–23 cohorts + most-recent snapshot), accessed March 2026.

Education – 6 CIP programs (4-digit), 4 with earnings

Major (CIP 4-digit)	Compl./yr	Earn 4yr	Earn 1yr	% > threshold	Median debt	Debt/earn	Earnings premium	2 of 3 yrs
Teacher Education and Professional Development, Specific Levels and MethodsCIP 1312 ›	660	$43,748 n=1,004	–	74.6%	$31,000	0.71×	Above benchmark +19%	Below benchmark 1 of 2 yrs
Education, GeneralCIP 1301 ›	125	$47,107 n=247	–	84.2%	$30,599	0.65×	Above benchmark +28%	Below benchmark 1 of 2 yrs
Special Education and TeachingCIP 1310 ›	33	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Educational/Instructional Media DesignCIP 1305 ›	25	$68,414 n=29	–	–	$28,109	0.41×	Above benchmark +86%	Clears all 2 yrs
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and ResearchCIP 1306	17	$44,242 n=50	–	80%	$30,742	0.69×	Above benchmark +20%	Below benchmark 1 of 2 yrs
Teaching English or French as a Second or Foreign LanguageCIP 1314 ›	10	–	–	–	$30,239	–	–	–

Major-level earnings, debt and threshold pass-rates are reported by College Scorecard only where enough graduates exist to protect privacy, so 4 of 6 majors show an earnings figure; the rest read “–”. % > threshold is ED’s own share of graduates out-earning the federal earnings threshold (the do-no-harm pass rate), drawn from the best available measurement window (4-, 5- or 1-year) pooled across all nine College Scorecard Field-of-Study releases; a small chip marks any figure not on the 4-year window, and hovering names the cohort size and source release. 2 of 3 yrs flags fields below the earnings-premium benchmark in two of the latest three reported cohort-years, the statutory trigger under the 2025 test (effective July 1, 2026). Indicative; the Department of Education’s official determination may differ. Source: U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard Field of Study (2014–15 through 2022–23 cohorts + most-recent snapshot), accessed March 2026.

Health Professions & Clinical Sciences – 5 CIP programs (4-digit), 4 with earnings

Major (CIP 4-digit)	Compl./yr	Earn 4yr	Earn 1yr	% > threshold	Median debt	Debt/earn	Earnings premium	2 of 3 yrs
Health and Medical Administrative ServicesCIP 5107 ›	520	$53,801 n=538	–	100%	$33,541	0.62×	Above benchmark +46%	Clears all 2 yrs
Alternative and Complementary Medicine and Medical SystemsCIP 5133 ›	146	$44,036 n=202	–	57.9%	$31,375	0.71×	Above benchmark +20%	Below benchmark 1 of 2 yrs
Mental and Social Health Services and Allied ProfessionsCIP 5115 ›	97	$48,922 n=112	–	100%	$33,129	0.68×	Above benchmark +33%	Below benchmark 1 of 2 yrs
Registered Nursing, Nursing Administration, Nursing Research and Clinical NursingCIP 5138 ›	47	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Health Services/Allied Health/Health Sciences, GeneralCIP 5100 ›	12	$55,689 n=29	–	79.3%	$34,500	0.62×	Above benchmark +51%	Clears all 2 yrs

Major-level earnings, debt and threshold pass-rates are reported by College Scorecard only where enough graduates exist to protect privacy, so 4 of 5 majors show an earnings figure; the rest read “–”. % > threshold is ED’s own share of graduates out-earning the federal earnings threshold (the do-no-harm pass rate), drawn from the best available measurement window (4-, 5- or 1-year) pooled across all nine College Scorecard Field-of-Study releases; a small chip marks any figure not on the 4-year window, and hovering names the cohort size and source release. 2 of 3 yrs flags fields below the earnings-premium benchmark in two of the latest three reported cohort-years, the statutory trigger under the 2025 test (effective July 1, 2026). Indicative; the Department of Education’s official determination may differ. Source: U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard Field of Study (2014–15 through 2022–23 cohorts + most-recent snapshot), accessed March 2026.

Psychology – 1 CIP program (4-digit), 1 with earnings

Major (CIP 4-digit)	Compl./yr	Earn 4yr	Earn 1yr	% > threshold	Median debt	Debt/earn	Earnings premium	2 of 3 yrs
Psychology, GeneralCIP 4201 ›	490	$48,325 n=508	–	100%	$32,813	0.68×	Above benchmark +31%	Below benchmark 1 of 2 yrs

Major-level earnings, debt and threshold pass-rates are reported by College Scorecard only where enough graduates exist to protect privacy, so 1 of 1 major shows an earnings figure; the rest read “–”. % > threshold is ED’s own share of graduates out-earning the federal earnings threshold (the do-no-harm pass rate), drawn from the best available measurement window (4-, 5- or 1-year) pooled across all nine College Scorecard Field-of-Study releases; a small chip marks any figure not on the 4-year window, and hovering names the cohort size and source release. 2 of 3 yrs flags fields below the earnings-premium benchmark in two of the latest three reported cohort-years, the statutory trigger under the 2025 test (effective July 1, 2026). Indicative; the Department of Education’s official determination may differ. Source: U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard Field of Study (2014–15 through 2022–23 cohorts + most-recent snapshot), accessed March 2026.

Homeland Security, Law Enforcement & Firefighting – 1 CIP program (4-digit), 1 with earnings

Major (CIP 4-digit)	Compl./yr	Earn 4yr	Earn 1yr	% > threshold	Median debt	Debt/earn	Earnings premium	2 of 3 yrs
Criminal Justice and CorrectionsCIP 4301 ›	468	$60,144 n=608	–	100%	$31,380	0.52×	Above benchmark +63%	Clears all 2 yrs

Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies – 2 CIP programs (4-digit), 2 with earnings

Major (CIP 4-digit)	Compl./yr	Earn 4yr	Earn 1yr	% > threshold	Median debt	Debt/earn	Earnings premium	2 of 3 yrs
Behavioral SciencesCIP 3017 ›	176	$45,157 n=438	–	88.8%	$40,083	0.89×	Above benchmark +23%	Below benchmark 1 of 2 yrs
GerontologyCIP 3011	12	$49,843 n=26	–	73.1%	$28,750	0.58×	Above benchmark +35%	Below benchmark 1 of 2 yrs

Major-level earnings, debt and threshold pass-rates are reported by College Scorecard only where enough graduates exist to protect privacy, so 2 of 2 majors show an earnings figure; the rest read “–”. % > threshold is ED’s own share of graduates out-earning the federal earnings threshold (the do-no-harm pass rate), drawn from the best available measurement window (4-, 5- or 1-year) pooled across all nine College Scorecard Field-of-Study releases; a small chip marks any figure not on the 4-year window, and hovering names the cohort size and source release. 2 of 3 yrs flags fields below the earnings-premium benchmark in two of the latest three reported cohort-years, the statutory trigger under the 2025 test (effective July 1, 2026). Indicative; the Department of Education’s official determination may differ. Source: U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard Field of Study (2014–15 through 2022–23 cohorts + most-recent snapshot), accessed March 2026.

Social Sciences – 4 CIP programs (4-digit), 4 with earnings

Major (CIP 4-digit)	Compl./yr	Earn 4yr	Earn 1yr	% > threshold	Median debt	Debt/earn	Earnings premium	2 of 3 yrs
SociologyCIP 4511 ›	104	$51,004 n=119	–	100%	$28,693	0.56×	Above benchmark +39%	Clears all 2 yrs
Political Science and GovernmentCIP 4510 ›	34	$54,740 n=38	–	100%	$27,172	0.50×	Above benchmark +49%	Clears all 2 yrs
Social Sciences, GeneralCIP 4501 ›	21	$48,970 n=52	–	100%	$32,813	0.67×	Above benchmark +33%	Clears all 2 yrs
AnthropologyCIP 4502 ›	16	$41,266 n=30	–	64.7% 5yr	$26,258	0.64×	Above benchmark +12%	Clears all 2 yrs

Major-level earnings, debt and threshold pass-rates are reported by College Scorecard only where enough graduates exist to protect privacy, so 4 of 4 majors show an earnings figure; the rest read “–”. % > threshold is ED’s own share of graduates out-earning the federal earnings threshold (the do-no-harm pass rate), drawn from the best available measurement window (4-, 5- or 1-year) pooled across all nine College Scorecard Field-of-Study releases; a small chip marks any figure not on the 4-year window, and hovering names the cohort size and source release. 2 of 3 yrs flags fields below the earnings-premium benchmark in two of the latest three reported cohort-years, the statutory trigger under the 2025 test (effective July 1, 2026). Indicative; the Department of Education’s official determination may differ. Source: U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard Field of Study (2014–15 through 2022–23 cohorts + most-recent snapshot), accessed March 2026.

Computer & Information Sciences – 3 CIP programs (4-digit), 0 with earnings

Major (CIP 4-digit)	Compl./yr	Earn 4yr	Earn 1yr	% > threshold	Median debt	Debt/earn	Earnings premium	2 of 3 yrs
Computer and Information Sciences, GeneralCIP 1101 ›	82	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Computer/Information Technology Administration and ManagementCIP 1110 ›	45	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Computer Software and Media ApplicationsCIP 1108 ›	7	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

Major-level earnings, debt and threshold pass-rates are reported by College Scorecard only where enough graduates exist to protect privacy, so 0 of 3 majors show an earnings figure; the rest read “–”. % > threshold is ED’s own share of graduates out-earning the federal earnings threshold (the do-no-harm pass rate), drawn from the best available measurement window (4-, 5- or 1-year) pooled across all nine College Scorecard Field-of-Study releases; a small chip marks any figure not on the 4-year window, and hovering names the cohort size and source release. 2 of 3 yrs flags fields below the earnings-premium benchmark in two of the latest three reported cohort-years, the statutory trigger under the 2025 test (effective July 1, 2026). Indicative; the Department of Education’s official determination may differ. Source: U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard Field of Study (2014–15 through 2022–23 cohorts + most-recent snapshot), accessed March 2026.

Communication & Journalism – 2 CIP programs (4-digit), 2 with earnings

Major (CIP 4-digit)	Compl./yr	Earn 4yr	Earn 1yr	% > threshold	Median debt	Debt/earn	Earnings premium	2 of 3 yrs
Communication and Media StudiesCIP 0901 ›	71	$61,909 n=79	–	78.5%	$33,341	0.54×	Above benchmark +68%	Clears all 2 yrs
JournalismCIP 0904 ›	59	$44,589 n=59	–	100%	$36,807	0.82×	Above benchmark +21%	Below benchmark 1 of 2 yrs

Family & Consumer Sciences – 2 CIP programs (4-digit), 1 with earnings

Major (CIP 4-digit)	Compl./yr	Earn 4yr	Earn 1yr	% > threshold	Median debt	Debt/earn	Earnings premium	2 of 3 yrs
Human Development, Family Studies, and Related ServicesCIP 1907 ›	85	$44,852 n=167	–	85.6%	$27,470	0.61×	Above benchmark +22%	Below benchmark 1 of 2 yrs
Family and Consumer Economics and Related StudiesCIP 1904 ›	11	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

Major-level earnings, debt and threshold pass-rates are reported by College Scorecard only where enough graduates exist to protect privacy, so 1 of 2 majors show an earnings figure; the rest read “–”. % > threshold is ED’s own share of graduates out-earning the federal earnings threshold (the do-no-harm pass rate), drawn from the best available measurement window (4-, 5- or 1-year) pooled across all nine College Scorecard Field-of-Study releases; a small chip marks any figure not on the 4-year window, and hovering names the cohort size and source release. 2 of 3 yrs flags fields below the earnings-premium benchmark in two of the latest three reported cohort-years, the statutory trigger under the 2025 test (effective July 1, 2026). Indicative; the Department of Education’s official determination may differ. Source: U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard Field of Study (2014–15 through 2022–23 cohorts + most-recent snapshot), accessed March 2026.

See the interactive dashboard for all fields and credential levels (associate through doctoral). Source: College Scorecard Field of Study.

Frequently asked

What is The University of Arizona Global Campus's student-faculty ratio?

The University of Arizona Global Campus reports a student-faculty ratio of 16:1 (IPEDS, fall 2023) – that is, about 16 students for every instructional faculty member.

How much does The University of Arizona Global Campus cost?

The average published cost of attendance is $37,594 and the average net price after aid is $31,266 (College Scorecard).

How much do The University of Arizona Global Campus graduates earn?

Median earnings ten years after entry are $35,404 (College Scorecard), measured across students who received federal aid.

Are The University of Arizona Global Campus's programs at risk under the federal earnings-premium test?

Indicatively, all 9 of the largest fields with available earnings data at The University of Arizona Global Campus cleared the AZ state earnings-premium benchmark on the latest reported cohort, as did all 29 of the individual majors within them, in each of the latest reported cohort-years. The 2025 federal test (effective July 1, 2026) can withdraw Title IV eligibility from a program whose graduates earn less than a typical worker without the credential for 2 of 3 years. 17 further fields with earnings data at this institution are not shown on this page and are not counted here. This is an estimate using College Scorecard field-of-study earnings against ACS state and national medians; the Department of Education's official determination uses its own cohort definition and may differ.

Which schools are The University of Arizona Global Campus's peers?

The University of Arizona Global Campus is benchmarked against 31 institutions in the Doctoral/Professional University · Public peer group; all percentiles and medians on this page are computed within that group.

Compare with peers

Grand Valley State University Florida Gulf Coast University Missouri State University-Springfield Eastern Kentucky University Western Kentucky University Kean University

Explore The University of Arizona Global Campus interactively

Open the full dashboard to switch peer views, hover trends, and compare head-to-head.

Open in dashboard

Want a custom dashboard for The University of Arizona Global Campus?

We build tailored intelligence dashboards – The University of Arizona Global Campus and the peer set you choose, the metrics and risk signals your team cares about, kept current and delivered to you. Tell us what you’d want to track and a specialist will scope it with you.

Request a custom dashboard

Source: U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard & IPEDS (most recent releases), with the U.S. Census Bureau (ACS), the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (Employment Projections, field-demand outlook) and WICHE (enrollment-cliff projections). Figures lag the current academic year by roughly two to three years. Percentiles and medians are computed within the institution's peer group. Financial Resilience is a transparent composite, see each component above. Compiled by Ibex Insights.